Scientific and Religious Perspectives on Creationism / Evolution

[Shoblast]

Thats dishonest.

[azlanhussain]

If you were to buy a book which one will you choose..

"Lets learn Bible"

or

"Why prostitute are learning bible"

though the content are the same..

anyway labeling others is what human are good at.. so be it what ever you want to say..

[vikraman]

well i commented on other atheism vs theism topics as well.. although their titles were well, atheism vs theism! Anyway it's dishonest to put up a title just to attract viewers. Going by that definition, every one of my blog posts should be titled "Rosmah buys new shoes."

[chongkeat]

Anyway it's dishonest to put up a title just to attract viewers.

Well, the original discussion was about the Atlas of Creation and stuff, but moved on from there pretty quickly. *hint, hint*

[azlanhussain]

Well maybe it started to be seen as swinging to a different direction starting from my post #21.. But don't get me wrong.. the discussion is still intach. Just that I found new links to prove that there are some similarities in both thinking (creationist & evolutionist). The only difference are the refusal to accept the creator (by some evolutionist) and the lack of in depth knowledge about the religion itself (by some of creationist).

But on the other hand if evolution process itself has been mentioned in the religion books, so why should there be any issue of not accepting God as the creator.. Doesn't make any sense to me..

[chongkeat]

But on the other hand if evolution process itself has been mentioned in religion books, so why should there be any issue of not accepting God as the creator.. Doesn't make any sense to me..

You see, that's the problem. It is not mentioned clearly, just an interpretation by others. And it is only one passage in the entire bible. Not very conclusive. So a lot of people are just going to say that it is just a coincidence.

[youngyew]

I just changed the title to reflect the thread content. Sorry to change your attractive title; I just thought it's better if we have a title that is easily understandable and that actually summarises the topic.

[chongkeat]

I just changed the title to reflect the thread content. Sorry to change your attractive title; I just thought it's better if we have a title that is easily understandable and that actually summarises the topic.

Just chipping in, but this topic isn't completely about Islam. Azlanhussain included links to sites quoting the Bible and stuff. And this thread is, from what I can see, trying to be scientific about creationism/evolution.

Just a suggestion.

[azlanhussain]

Originally Posted by chongkeat

You see, that's the problem. It is not mentioned clearly, just an interpretation by others. And it is only one passage in the entire bible. Not very conclusive. So a lot of people are just going to say that it is just a coincidence.

Yes I will agree with you from the Bible point of view. That's why I'm still trying to find more information which could best represent Bible in this issue.

Anyway if you check from the other links (Quran).. See how details it is mentioned.. though it was not mentioned in a direct or scientific manner, since human knowledge back then was not that advance, but now everything mentioned in Quran is much clearer, understandable and make more sense..

Originally Posted by youngyew

I just changed the title to reflect the thread content. Sorry to change your attractive title; I just thought it's better if we have a title that is easily understandable and that actually summarises the topic.

No problem.. thanks...

[youngyew]

Originally Posted by chongkeat

Just chipping in, but this topic isn't completely about Islam. Azlanhussain included links to sites quoting the Bible and stuff. And this thread is, from what I can see, trying to be scientific about creationism/evolution.

Just a suggestion.

Changed the word Islam to Religious.